Flavio Grimaldi
  • Home
  • About
  • Term I
    • Landing
    • Documenting Design
    • Digital Fabrication
    • The machine Paradox
    • Design Studio I
      • Design Space
      • Roles of Prototyping in 1PP Research through Design
      • Collective Design Studio
      • Design Dialogues I
    • Living With Your Own Ideas
    • Extended Intelligences
    • Design With Others
    • Biology Zero
      • Designing a GMO
    • Agriculture Zero
      • Hack-ing Farm-ing
  • Term II
    • Design Studio II
      • Intervention I: Hacking the Algorithm
      • Ethics of Design
      • Intervention II: Public Space or Contested Territory?
      • How to Design a Research Project
      • Intervention III: Makerspaces catalyst for social change
      • Transition Design
      • Intervention IV: Anti-Racist Community Days
      • Design Dialogues II
    • Situated Design Practices
    • Communicating Ideas
    • Living Materials
    • Collective Intelligence
    • H(n)MI
    • Micro_Challenge
    • Micro_Challenge
    • Extended Intelligence II
  • Term III
    • Design Studio III
    • Communicating Ideas
    • FAB-Challenge
  • Pictorial
  • Final Project
  • Linkedin
  • Instagram
  • Email
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • Collective Design Intervention I
  • Collective Design Intervention II
  1. Term I
  2. Design Studio I

Collective Design Studio

PreviousRoles of Prototyping in 1PP Research through DesignNextDesign Dialogues I

Last updated 26 days ago

The session begins with each of us sharing our individual design spaces, including projects, inspirations, and possible future experiments. This process helps uncover shared themes, interests, and opportunities for collaboration within the group. We aim is to identify overlapping areas in our design motivations and collectively reflect on the purpose and values driving our interventions.

The activity wasn’t just about sharing but also about reflecting. We explored the purpose and motivations behind our individual design space progression, discussing questions such as: Why did we begin this journey? What drives our choices? And how might these motivations align with those of others?

This reflective dialogue allowed us to surface unconscious assumptions and challenge our perspectives, creating opportunities for growth and deeper collaboration.

This space is not just a repository of projects but a living, evolving network of resources, ideas, and opportunities. It represents a shift from working in isolation to collaborate on creating in a context that is socially and materially embedded.

This process is crucial because design interventions are enriched by the diversity of voices, skills, and experiences that come together. When we combine our efforts, we can tackle more complex challenges, build trust, and engage in meaningful experimentation that transcends individual limitations.


Collective Design Intervention I

The purpose of the collective design intervention was to analyze human interaction within a collaborative framework, emphasizing the act of making, whether creating something for another person or simply engaging in the collaborative process itself.

While human interaction may seem straightforward, the intervention challenged participants to break away from their daily routines and engage in activities without tangible rewards. The focus was purely on the intrinsic value of participation and collaboration, fostering connections and creativity for the sake of the experience itself.

Initially, the intervention did not elicit much response from people in the public space. The lack of engagement highlighted an important insight: sometimes, interactions need a starting point to spark participation. It was only after we began taking action ourselves, demonstrating the activity and creating a visible point of curiosity, that others started to engage.

As the intervention progressed, more people joined in, and a group conversation began to form around the object. This evolution underscored the importance of taking initiative to catalyze interaction and showed how collaborative dynamics can organically grow once the initial barrier is overcome.


Collective Design Intervention II

Digital prosthetics, such as smartphones, wearable devices, and other technologies, have become crucial filters in modern society, reshaping how people interact with the world and each other. Studies highlight that for many, interactions mediated through these devices feel more natural than face-to-face communication. This shift has redefined social norms, with conversations and connections increasingly occurring in virtual spaces. While digital tools provide access to information and facilitate global connectivity, they also filter and fragment human interactions, challenging traditional notions of presence and intimacy.

A key aspect of digital prosthetics is their potential to change perspectives and foster empathy, particularly when paired with advances in artificial intelligence. AI can analyze and adapt to diverse human experiences, creating tools and platforms that encourage people to see the world from another's point of view. For example, AI-driven simulations or virtual reality experiences can immerse individuals in scenarios that mirror another person’s challenges, emotions, or cultural contexts. Such technologies can break down biases, foster mutual understanding, and build empathy across diverse communities.

By leveraging AI, society has an opportunity to use digital prosthetics not only as communication tools but also as instruments of social transformation. These innovations can enable individuals to engage more deeply with others, reframe their perspectives, and nurture more meaningful connections in a world that is increasingly mediated by technology. Embracing this potential will require balancing the benefits of these tools with mindful strategies to preserve the authenticity of human interaction.


Here are my Design Space updates 👇

MDEF students' Collective Design Space