Transition Design

Mapping Actants and Theorizing Change

Makerspaces are hubs of innovation and collaboration, fostering hands-on learning and experimentation with technology, design, and craftsmanship. However, they are not neutral spaces; they are shaped by cultural knowledge systems, power dynamics, and epistemological frameworks that determine whose knowledge is valued and whose is marginalized.

Ethnocognition, or the cultural dimensions of knowledge production, influences makerspaces, and using Actant Mapping and the Theory of Change, we can analyze the relationships between human and non-human actors, power structures, and the transition pathways toward more inclusive and sustainable makerspaces.

Understanding Knowledge Ecologies [Mapping Actants]

Actant Mapping provides a framework to visualize the interactions between various stakeholders and materials within makerspaces.

Human actants include makers, facilitators, indigenous artisans, technologists, funders, and policymakers, each bringing different knowledge systems.

Non-human actants include tools, digital platforms, fabrication materials, AI, and open-source knowledge repositories.

One key insight from Actant Mapping is the imbalance in knowledge representation. Western technological paradigms often dominate, prioritizing digital fabrication, coding, and high-tech solutions. Meanwhile, traditional and indigenous making practices, such as textile weaving, natural dyeing, and biomaterial-based construction, are often overlooked or undervalued.

Mapping these actants reveals tensions, like in the case of open-source software where they may democratize access, meanwhile, proprietary patents restrict knowledge sharing.

Transitioning Toward Inclusive Makerspaces [Theory of Change]

A Theory of Change helps envision a pathway for transforming makerspaces into inclusive, diverse environments that respect multiple epistemologies. It is essential then to identify systemic barriers, imagine a desirable future, and outline transition strategies.

1_Recognizing Systemic Issues

Current makerspaces often operate under Eurocentric knowledge hierarchies, where computational and high-tech skills are considered superior to traditional craftsmanship. Access to funding and resources is often biased, limiting opportunities for cultural artisans and community-driven making practices.

2_Envisioning a Future of Hybrid Knowledge Systems

An ideal future makerspace fosters coexistence between high-tech and low-tech, digital and analog, scientific and indigenous knowledge systems. Knowledge must be shared equitably, creating a new paradigm of innovation that values both heritage knowledge and emerging technologies.

3_Pathways for Transition

To achieve this vision, we may consider to develop and adopt strategic interventions:

• Prototype Hybrid Fabrication Models

• Policy and Funding Reform

• Educational Shifts

• Community-Led Innovation

By integrating Transition design methodologies in my research, I could examine power structures in makerspaces and strategize for a more inclusive, sustainable and innovative alternative present, where people from marginalized communities become indispensable resources of knowledge and culture in the new makers' ecosystem.